Adding an answer below to clarify. This section is mostly based on Rosen's book above.
Upcoming Events. So the difference is between asserting restrictions on your own code and asserting them on the code you got under a different license. If someone wants to use the library, how are the licenses handled? A license is an agreement by which the owner the licensor of something in the case of the LinkedIn question, a trademark grants , to someone else the licensee , rights that are less that all of the rights to that thing.
Remember, the author does not waive his copyright for his work by releasing under a license, the author is free to choose what he wants to allow with it. Subscribe to our newsletter. This means that the vehicle for rights is different always direct in the case of the BSD license, either direct or indirect in the case of the MIT license.
Neither Sub-licensor nor Software Owners are neither responsible nor liable for any damages, breaches of Product performance, intellectual property loss or any other Loss, whether direct or indirect, incidental, special or consequential, arising in connection with the Agreement, and is not bound to any recourse.
Under the BSD license, the scope of modifications are indeed determinative regarding which license governs. You are asking about a specific legal document and a term used in it.
Liability Neither Sub-licensor nor Software Owners are neither responsible nor liable for any damages, breaches of Product performance, intellectual property loss or any other Loss, whether direct or indirect, incidental, special or consequential, arising in connection with the Agreement, and is not bound to any recourse.
In this case one would have additional permissions which were removable, governed under section 7 as additional permissions, but also allow, as an additional restriction under section 7 b , a notice saying that certain rights are not removable.
Powered by WordPress using the Luxury theme.
So once you add your own code to the file you can add whatever restrictions you want, but they apply only to your own code and you can't assert them against the code you got under the BSD license absent an explicit right to sublicense.
I think you need to keep this simple; look at it in terms of "distribution," not "sublicensing. Article 1: Following the above discussion this means that the MIT license allows something that the BSD license probably does not in most jurisdictions, namely sublicensing.